Activity Meeting Come back Knowledge Library and Information 2026 organized by
HMPS Science Library and Information become receptacle important for Study Program
students Knowledge Library and Information from various force For convey aspirations in a
way direct to the lecturers. In activities held on Friday, June 12, 2026 student No only disclose
constraints, input, and expectations faced during the lecture process, but also get responses
and explanations in a way direct from lecturer related various issue academic and nonacademic
delivered.
Aspiration First come from student class of 2021, they disclose related change name
of study program Knowledge Library become a Study Program Knowledge Library and
Information, which is assessed Not yet fully implemented in administration academic. Some
students Still meet use old name of study program in various document official, which causes
confusion and considered No in line with existing policies. Responding to issue this, lecturer
state that party faculty will quick follow up problem said. Faculty planning For adapt use
Name official study program on documents and administration that are still use old name to
match with applicable regulation. Besides that, evaluation and monitoring will done For
ensure that implementation name of the new study program can implemented in a way
consistent throughout service academic and administration.
Continuing on to aspirations from student class of 2022, a number of other problems
also arise appointed. Students convey hope about procedure guidance and scheduling task the
end that is considered need term quite a long time, starting from proposal seminars to
implementation hearing thesis. Situation This felt make things difficult student in plan
achievement studies appropriate time as well as cause uncertainty in planning academic.
Responding matter this, lecturer explain that the guidance and scheduling process task end
need adjustment between time available students and lecturers mentor. Besides that, the
amount lecturers in the Study Program Knowledge Library and Information participate
influence the process, each lecturer guide around 11-12 students who did not only originate
from class of 2022 only However There is from class of 2021, 2020, even 2019. Therefore that
is, during the guidance process and scheduling task end assessed ongoing quite a long time,
factor the cause No only originate from party lecturers, but also influenced by conditions
mechanism academic needs customized with various party related. The lecturer also
emphasized importance good communication and coordination between students and
lecturers mentor so that the guidance process can walk more effective.
Still from same generation, students also conveyed aspirations about burden
assignments on several eye perceived lectures Enough heavy. Students evaluate that giving
adjacent tasks on some eye studying cause difficulty in arrange time and share focus
academic optimally. Respond matter said, lecturer explain that implementation of the
proposal seminar in semester 6 is policies taken based on evaluation of study programs.
Previously, proposal seminars were held in semester 7 so that time available student For do
research and guidance become more limited. With implementation of a more comprehensive
proposal seminar early, students expected own more time long For finish research and
assignments end optimally.
Besides that , students convey hope that communication academic between lecturers
and students can walk more effective, especially in the guidance process and delivery
information related task end. According to students, better communication Good can help
minimize occurrence miscommunication and misunderstanding during the academic process
ongoing. Responding to matter said, lecturer explain that every lecturer own schedule,
busyness, and patterns different guidance. Therefore that, the guidance process task end No
can fully customized with calendar academic, but rather more depending on the progress of
research and preparation task the end of each student. The lecturer also emphasized that
smooth guidance process is results coordination between students and lecturers mentor in
accordance with existing conditions.
Students also proposed that the system scheduling proposal seminars and hearings can
implemented in a way more structured and coordinated. Students hope existence certainty
more schedule clear so that the preparation process academic can done with more optimal.
Responding matter said, lecturer explain that scheduling hearing task end follow timetable
the exam that has been determined by the faculty. Therefore that, implementation hearing
need adapt with terms and schedule academics that apply at the level faculty.
Continuing on to aspirations from student class of 2023, students interesting attention
to placement eye studying Philosophy Knowledge Library and Information in semester 6
which is considered not enough right. They have an opinion that material about paradigms
and approaches study should studied before student start compile a research proposal. In
semester 6, students Already start determine method study For task end, so that understanding
about knowledge philosophy felt late obtained. Responding aspirations this, lecturer explain
that placement eye study in curriculum No Can done with easy Because must through a
thorough evaluation process. However thus, input related eye studying Philosophy will
noticed in evaluation the curriculum that will be come. Regarding delay in delivery material,
lecturer convey that condition lectures in that semester were greatly influenced by the
implementation job training and holidays academic, so that a number of Sunday lectures lost
and must replaced in limited time.
Besides that, students also feel burdened with implementation projects and delivery
ongoing material in a way simultaneously. In a number of eye lectures, projects started
before material theoretical finished given, causing student difficult understand base
implementation. They also questioned about the process of preparing a research proposal
before met by the lecturer mentor official, because worry will appear difference view
between lecturer proposal seminar supervisor and lecturer future mentor appointed.
Responding matter said, lecturer explain that condition lectures in the year This of course
experience a number of obstacles that impact implementation learning. Students new can
follow lectures in a way full on Sunday third until fourth semester because must carry out job
training, so that there is a number of an unplanned meeting can walk as should be. Besides
that, implementation lectures also coincide with holiday Eid al-Fitr who causes decrease time
learning about five weeks. Condition the result in lecturer need do adjustment and
acceleration delivery material for achievement learning still can fulfilled in accordance with
calendar applicable academic regulations. The lecturer also explained that implementation
job training in the previous semester was basically only get permission during One Sunday
Because existence adjustment calendar university academics. If there is students who carry
out job training until a number of week, the amount relatively a little and they still required
fulfil provision as well as replace lack of internship hours that have been set.
Students also highlighted mark eye lectures in classes C and D up to moment This
Not yet experience improvement. Lecturer explain that previously has delivered that repair
mark will done after implementation job training finished. Input the will become attention
For followed up so that the repair process mark can quick completed in accordance with the
one who has promised to student.
Besides that, students convey related preparation of research proposals before student
get lecturer mentor officia, lecturer explain that mechanism the done For help student prepare
design study more early. Although thus, lecturer understand concern student about possibility
existence difference view between lecturer proposal seminar supervisor and lecturer future
mentor determined. Therefore that, students expected can adjust and discuss return
direction his research together lecturer mentor after determination done.
aspiration that emerged is change in curriculum that results in a number of eye
studying changing semesters. Situation This considered make things difficult for students in
the middle follow eye studying improvement and potential hinder achievement graduation
appropriate time. Besides that, students also emphasized existence incompatibility material
on one of the eye college, which is more focus on practice marketing than appropriate
content with Name eye studying Responding to the matter said, lecturer convey that
aspirations and complaints submitted student will continued to lecturer guardian eye the
relevant lecture.
Continuing on to aspirations student class of 2024, delivered hope about sustainability
lecturer in carry out agreement lectures, especially those related to with system assessment
and implementation learning that sometimes No in accordance with agreement early. They
also complained often change timetable studying as well as transition method learning from
offline to online that is done in a way sudden without Enough announcement. Respond matter
said, lecturer explain that change schedule and method learning sometimes done Because
condition certain things that are not can avoided. Although thus, lecturer will make an effort
guard consistency to agreement lectures as well as convey information change to student with
more Good.
Student have an opinion that part method teaching Still not enough explained in a way
clear, so that make material difficult For understood. In some eye lectures that are of a nature
practice, they feel given demands enough work Lots without existence explanation or
training adequate basis. In addition that, there are also complaints about task projects that
must be completed in time short without instruction clear technicalities. Regarding
difficulty in understand material, lecturer remind that student Already given chance For ask
and discuss during the learning process, so expected they more active utilise time said. For
eye studying Method Study Quantitative, the lecturer also explained the need coordinate with
lecturer Statistics for students get greater understanding deep about SPSS and technique
analysis related statistics with study.
Besides that, in discussion was also discussed about eye Multimedia lectures are
considered own room scope very broad material compared to with number of credits
available . Responding to matter this, lecturer explain that coverage extensive material of
course become challenge in operate Multimedia lectures . Therefore , there are limitation in
delivery necessary materials customized with time existing lectures. Students also
complained about One eye frequent lectures canceled in a way sudden as well as
existence ambiguity in implementation exam end of semester. Responding matter this, the
study program state will continue aspirations the to lecturer related For get action carry on.
Continuing on to aspirations student class of 2025, revealed that method teaching in
several eye studying felt too fast so that they difficulty For understand material with well .
They also complained lack of access to material learning after lectures end Because No all
material presentation and materials supporters provided For students. Regarding matter said,
lecturer explain that references and materials reading usually has given since beginning
lectures. Lecturers also try For Keep going renew material, especially in the eyes studying
Meeting Come back Information (TBI), with linking draft Information Retrieval with
development generative AI. Students expected learn references provided in a way
independent moreover first, then results learning the used as material discussion during the
lecture process ongoing .
Student emphasize about change timetable lectures that sometimes happen in a way
suddenly as well as delay in give information about cancellation class. This is felt Enough
troublesome, especially for students who must go through distance Far For going to campus .
They also hope facility Study like internet access on campus Can improved so that learning
become more comfortable. Regarding change timetable studying which impacts the learning
process, lecturers explain that part big condition the caused by adjustments calendar
university academics, which are outside study program control. About internet facilities on
campus are assessed No adequate, aspirations This will delivered to party related For
evaluated.
Students also conveyed hope that the delivery material done with more structured and
informational academic given more beginning If There is change timetable lectures.
Responding matter said, lecturer convey that student No need hesitant For convey if there is
material that has not been understood. Students can lift hands and inform the part that is still
confusing so that lecturer can explain return material the with more detailed and customized
speed delivery material in class.
In session delivery aspirations others, students class of 2025 hopes lecturer can more
fast in respond message or communication academic. Besides that, they also mentioned
existence inconsistent in implementation contract lectures, such as delay the exam in progress
longer than specified schedule.
In session ask answer and give response, appears complaint from student class of 2023
also delivered aspirations related use example of a proposal or task study student in the
learning process . Students hope identity owner work disguised moreover first. Respond
matter said, lecturer state agree and confirm that use work student should done with
permission owner work as well as still notice ethics academic. Furthermore , students class of
2024 delivered complaint related implementation lectures on subjects studying Indonesian
Librarianship. Students evaluate that lectures several times canceled or experience change in
a way sudden so that disrupt the learning process. In addition that, students also expressed
that a number of task given without limit time clear collection. Students participate
highlight implementation Final Semester Examination (UAS) is up time delivery aspirations
Not yet implemented in accordance schedule that has been determined . Responding matter
said, lecturer convey that input and complaints student will continued to lecturer guardian eye
the relevant lecture For become material evaluation more carry on.
Close discussion, lecturer participate convey a number of hope to student related
implementation lectures. Lecturers remind importance comply the agreement that has been
set at the beginning of the semester, especially about discipline time attendance in class .
Students expected can present appropriate time and comply limit tolerance the delay that has
been agreed together so that the learning process can ongoing with orderly and effective .
Besides that, the lecturer also appealed student For notice ethics communication
moment contact lecturer through personal media, such as WhatsApp. Lecturer convey that
Still there is students who send message without list clear identity so that make things
difficult lecturer For recognize sender message. Therefore that , students expected always
introduce self with include name, year, class, and the desired needs delivered when contact
lecturer. Close discussion, the lecturer also conveyed a number of hope to student about
implementation lectures and the learning process in the Study Program Knowledge Library
and Information. Teacher want students to more involved active in activity college , no only
just present For take notes presence, but also prepare material before class, brave put forward
opinion, and active participate in discussion during learning.
Besides In addition, the lecturer also reminded students to utilise technology,
especially intelligence artificial ( Artificial Intelligence /AI), with wise and responsible
answer. AI is expected can used as tool help in the learning and development process ideas,
not as replacement ability think or understanding student to material college. Students
expected still responsible answer in a way academic to every the tasks and work they do
produce.
The lecturer also emphasized importance ability analysis and thinking critical .
Students expected No only just memorize or answer question with the common way, but
capable understand, analyze, and evaluate various problem with more deep through habit
reading, writing, discussing and evaluating information with critical. Finally, the lecturer
hope all student can participate in create atmosphere active, conducive, and mutually
supportive class appreciate. With still focus during lectures and respect the learning process
teaching, it is expected quality learning can increase and provide benefit maximum for all
over member academic.
In a way Overall, the expectations conveyed by the lecturer emphasize importance
participation active student in learning, wise use of AI, reinforcement ability think critical,
implementation ethics good academics, as well as awakening atmosphere conducive class
as business together in increase quality education in the Study Program Knowledge Library
and Information.
In a way general, the expectations expressed student from various force show
existence need For increase communication academic, consistency in implementation lectures,
clarity teaching materials, as well as arrangement curriculum and schedule more academic
good. Study program and teachers welcome positive various input this and determined make
it as material evaluation For increase quality learning and services academic in Study
Program Knowledge Library and Information.
